Digital marketing budget template
A digital marketing budget template in Excel with three tabs: a forecast that works backwards from your target to the media budget it actually needs, allocation splits based on how mature your measurement is, and an annual budget by channel with row and column totals. The forecast ends in a viability verdict, because a plan where a customer costs more than they are worth needs changing, not funding.
- TEMPLATE
- XLSX
- FREE
- Best for
- Anyone setting a budget who has been asked "how much do you need?"
- Includes
- Excel forecast + allocation + annual budget
- Time to use
- 45 minutes
Free to download and use in your own client work. No email address required.
The most common way to set a marketing budget is a percentage of revenue. It produces a number with no relationship to what an outcome costs you, which is why it is so hard to defend when questioned.
Work backwards from the target instead.
The forecast
Every input, and where each number should come from:
| Input | Where the number comes from |
|---|---|
| Target outcomes | The number of customers or enquiries you need. |
| Conversion rate | Enquiry to customer, from your own data. Not a benchmark. |
| Required enquiries | Target ÷ conversion rate. |
| Cost per enquiry | From your own last three months, blended. |
| Required media budget | Required enquiries × cost per enquiry. |
| Sanity check | Budget ÷ target outcomes must be below what a customer is worth. If not, the plan is wrong, not the budget. |
From those, the sheet calculates enquiries needed, the media budget required, the cost per customer, the margin per customer — and a verdict.
The check most forecasts skip
If cost per customer is at or above what a customer is worth, the sheet says “Not viable”. That is not a budget problem. The answer is a higher conversion rate, a higher price, or a cheaper channel — and a bigger budget makes it worse rather than better.
Preview of the file
Splitting the budget
Allocation advice is usually given by industry, which is close to useless. The variable that actually matters is whether your measurement works yet.
| Situation | Media | Production | Tools | People | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No working measurement yet | 0–20% | 30% | 20% | 30% | Spending on media before measurement works is how budget disappears without a lesson |
| One channel proven | 50% | 25% | 10% | 15% | Scale what works before adding another |
| Two or three channels running | 60% | 20% | 10% | 10% | Hold 10% back for testing, ring-fenced so it is not absorbed |
The first row is the one people resist. Running media against broken tracking does not produce a smaller result — it produces an unmeasurable one, which is worse, because you cannot tell whether to continue.
The annual budget
The third tab is a channel-by-month grid with row and column totals. Two conventions worth keeping:
- Media and production on separate lines. Blended into one, production gets quietly starved whenever media needs more, and nobody notices until the creative is stale.
- A contingency line that is a real line. If contingency is “whatever is left”, the first opportunity gets funded by cancelling something that was working.
Common mistakes
- Budgeting by percentage of revenue with no reference to what an outcome costs.
- Forecasting from a published industry benchmark instead of your own numbers.
- No contingency, so the first opportunity is funded by cancelling something that was working.
- Media and production in one line, so production gets starved unnoticed.
- A forecast with no sanity check against customer value.
- Treating the annual budget as fixed once set, when the point of measuring is to reallocate.